Strategy blog: Stagflation, a premature diagnosis

Strategy team: Victor Balfour

Alongside the terrible human cost, the conflict will have an economic impact: more inflation, and less growth. The inflation comes from squeezed energy and commodity markets, and from supply-side disruptions; the threat to growth comes from those higher energy costs, the disruptions, and from the likely impact on consumer and business confidence of the first major threat to global peace in our working lifetimes.

The prospect of (even) more inflation alongside deteriorating growth prospects is prompting talk of stagflation (output “stagnation” + price “inflation”). Such an outlook is perhaps the most difficult conjunction conventional portfolios can face: a poor economic growth environment is bad for corporate profitability and stocks, while high inflation is bad for bonds and other nominal assets – there is no obvious hiding place.

Stagflation was coined as a description of the difficult macro climate of the 1970s and early 1980s. In the decade ending 1983, average annual US GDP growth halved, to 2%, while average inflation doubled, to 8%. Over the same period, average UK GDP growth fell by two-thirds, to just 1%, while average inflation more than doubled, accelerating from 6% to 14%. It was a testing period for wealth managers (see figure), with both bonds and stocks often falling well behind inflation (though markets were able to rally strongly towards its end, as policymakers – and voters – signalled a determination to tackle at least the inflation part of the problem.). Cash performed more strongly than securities thanks to its nominal stability and high interest rates, but it still lagged behind inflation.

Long-term ‘real’ (inflation-adjusted) returns

1960-2021 (indexed, log scale)

The potential parallels now are clear – much of the really serious inflation then was amplified by war and oil prices – but the headlines are premature. For one thing, today’s weakening growth prospects and/or rising inflation may prove relatively short-lived: the episode is too young to warrant talk of a new investment regime or epoch. The original stagflation was a long time brewing – it didn’t arrive (as today’s headlines have) almost overnight. Going into this episode, economic growth has been reviving, showing more post-pandemic momentum than many had feared.

For another, the stagflation itself may have been a symptom of a deeper malaise, and it may have been that sickness, not the growth and inflation rates themselves, that was the prime mover of the poor investment returns. Then, the industrial relations backdrop had been steadily worsening for many years, and corporate profitability – and any notion of “shareholder value” – was fragile.

Things recently have been very different in both these respects. And the structure of the big economies has shifted markedly towards service-sector and virtual output, reducing the importance of the tangible primary inputs and manufactures that have led inflation higher so far.

We do have strategic misgivings about bonds, as we have written here often. We have also become tactically less positive on stocks in 2022 – initially as it became clear that the big central banks might at last be ready to start raising interest rates, and then on account of the risks posed by the invasion of Ukraine.

But it is too soon to consider a bigger, wholesale shift into the sorts of real assets – property, gold – that might offer intuitive protection if the double whammy of stagflation were to take root, and if labour relations and corporate profitability were looking more vulnerable.

Disclaimer

Past performance is not a guide to future performance and nothing in this blog constitutes advice. Although the information and data herein are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is or will be made and, save in the case of fraud, no responsibility or liability is or will be accepted by Rothschild & Co Wealth Management UK Limited as to or in relation to the fairness, accuracy or completeness of this document or the information forming the basis of this document or for any reliance placed on this document by any person whatsoever. In particular, no representation or warranty is given as to the achievement or reasonableness of any future projections, targets, estimates or forecasts contained in this document. Furthermore, all opinions and data used in this document are subject to change without prior notice.

Read more articles

  • Supply chains: state of play

    Strategy Blog

    President Trump’s aggressive tariff agenda threatens global trade. Despite rerouted exports and rising costs, supply chains remain resilient, though pressure may grow if tariffs persist.

  • Strategic exits: an introduction and guide to optimising your exit

    Entrepreneurs

    Achieving a successful business exit is a significant milestone, and navigating this complex process requires careful planning and expert advice. We are proud to support Boardwave in its mission of accelerating success by offering insights and guidance on optimising exits for entrepreneurs.

  • Growth Equity Update

    Insights

    Not all AI. The strength of VC funding growth (up 3x ytd in the US, up 20% In Europe) is led by AI but it’s not the whole story. To the end of April funding for ‘non-AI’ companies is up 67% yoy in the US and 14% in Europe. Software, biotech and fintech are all prominent – we look at what’s driving this.

  • Rothschild & Co expands Wealth Management offering in Luxembourg

    Press releases

    Rothschild & Co is pleased to announce the expansion of its Wealth Management activities in Luxembourg. This strategic move is part of Rothschild & Co's ongoing commitment to providing first class Private Banking services to its clients across Europe.

  • Trump II: FAQs

    Market Perspective

    In this Market Perspective we discuss the economic impact of Trump's second term, focusing on tariffs, inflation, and market volatility, while highlighting potential geopolitical shifts and the uncertain outlook for global growth and investment strategies.

  • Rothschild & Co Appoints Matthew J. Greenberger as Managing Director and Head of Real Estate, North America

    Press releases

    Rothschild & Co is pleased to announce that Matthew J. Greenberger will join the firm as Managing Director and Head of Real Estate, North America, based in New York. In this role, Mr. Greenberger will be responsible for leading Rothschild & Co’s real estate advisory activities across the region, strengthening the firm’s capabilities in an expanding sector.

Back to top